![]() The hypothesis, roughly stated, is that some of the procedures that create grammatical patterns in sentences are in an important sense indifferent to the content of the symbols they manipulate, in somewhat the same way that the procedures for long multiplication are indifferent to the numbers involved in the computation. In this chapter we explore a controversial hypothesis about the nature of the syntactic processing system. Thirdly, in order to rule out an alternative account in terms of syntactic rather than constructional priming, we present semantic evidence obtained by a sorting study, showing that subjects exhibited a strong tendency towards a construction-based sorting, which even reflects recent explanations of how constructions are related. Secondly, these priming effects correlate strongly with the verb-construction preferences in native speaker corpora: verbs which are strongly associated with one construction resist priming to another semantically compatible construction more importantly, the priming effects doĬorrelate with verb-construction preferences from German translation equivalents, ruling out a translational explanation. Firstly, in a sentence-fragment completion study with German learners of English, we obtained a significant priming effect between constructions. We present interrelated evidence from three different methods, all of which speak in favor of attributing an ontological status to constructions for non-native speakers of English. ![]() In Construction Grammar, the ultimate grammatical unit is the construction, a conventionalized form-meaning pairing. The second argument is the "inverse-preference effects" whereby structures that are less favored seem to exhibit higher syntactic/structural priming. First, structural priming needs some form of memory the effects of the prime are stored for long enough so that it can influence the processing of target. Two issues are used to explain the results. The results of the independent samples t-test showed that priming resulted in the implicit learning of the structure in question among the participants of the high group only. Experiment 2 dealt with the question of implicit learning: the participants of the experimental groups, previously primed for the structure, described the pictures on their own. The results showed that priming was effective and the participants of the experimental groups outperformed the control group members, with the participants of the high group performing better. In experiment 1, the participants in the experimental groups were provided with indirect questions/requests as the prime, while the ones in the control group were not primed for the structure in question. The participants were asked to take part in two picture description tasks. The participants were placed in three proficiency groups of high, mid and control. 75 Iranian EFL learners participated in two experiments. The present study deals with two research questions: whether structural priming is effective in later production of the desired structures and whether structural priming leads to learning these structures. The present study deals with the role structural priming plays in the retention (implicit learning) of indirect questions/requests among Iranian EFL learners. Structural priming, a psycholinguistic phenomenon whereby the act of processing an utterance with a particular structure facilitates processing a subsequent utterance with the same or related structure, has been increasingly used to investigate structural processing and representation during sentence production in both first and second language acquisition.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |